Jerome Kagan, PhD at Dana Arts, Learning, and the Brain Conference

March 5th, 2010

The Dana Foundation’s Arts, Learning, and the Brain conference proceedings highlight both neurological and psychological reasons for inclusion of arts education in urban school curriculum. An excerpt from Jerome Kagan’s prepared remarks to the conference on the Dana Foundation site: “The first advantage is that it boosts the self confidence among the children who are behind in mastery of reading and arithmetic… (C)hildren live in an economy where a high school diploma is absolutely necessary and a college degree advantageous for successful adaptation to our technological economy. This was not the case a century or two earlier. Neither Benjamin Franklin nor Abraham Lincoln had more than two years of formal schooling. If we eliminate the estimated 5 to 8 percent of American children who have a serious compromise in their cognitive abilities, due either to genes, or damage to their brain before or during the birth process, a postnatal infection, or a pregnant mother who abused alcohol or drugs, the remaining 92 to 95 percent are psychologically able to obtain both degrees. Therefore, we have to ask why the high school dropout rate is excessively high among youth from poor and working class families, and why the average scores of all American youth on tests of academic skills are below those of many other developed nations. An important reason for this sad state of affairs is that children, like adults, are vulnerable to becoming discouraged when they sense that a goal they desire is probably unattainable.” Read his entire piece here.

Do We Really Need the Arts? Without a Doubt

March 5th, 2010

SEE Magazine of Edmonton published an oped March 4, 2010 by Marliss Weber considering government support for the arts. An excerpt: “Do we really need arts funding? Do we really need the arts? To anyone who lives in an arts bubble, which I fully admit to, the answer seems obvious, and it’s a loud, screaming, impassioned, YES!! But, stepping out of the arts bubble, why, really, should the government pay money to support a tiny theatre company whose audience take is less than the rental cost of the hall? Or the visual artist who slaps three shades of grey on a canvas and calls it a masterpiece or the musician whose lyrics rhapsodize poetically the joys of soft toilet paper? And sometimes I wonder, having seen all of these shows, and many others of their kind, whether art shouldn’t have to follow the free market. Shouldn’t art, as a sector of our economy, bend to the will of the people? Shouldn’t art that people like and support flourish, and the art that people don’t choose to support disappear into obscurity? Would it be hugely problematic for our society if our art followed a democratic, free market system? I’ll answer my own question by saying, yes, I think it would be hugely problematic, and this is why. The minute artists are forced to consider the populist will (any more so than they already do), any drive for innovation, any spark of creativity will be lost. Artists need to feel safe to take risks, to develop new forms, to push boundaries of established thought. This is the artist’s role in society, and to force artists to do only that which they know they can sell is the death knell for creativity (further to this point, look at the state of Broadway theatre, and you’ll know of what I speak — a Spiderman musical? Are you kidding me?)” Read the whole article here.

Scientist Kraus Researching Neurological Impact of Music Practice

March 5th, 2010

Writing in the UK Telegraph on February 20, 2010 Richard Gray reported on Professor Nina Kraus’s research into neurological impact of music practice. An excerpt: “Neuroscientists have found that musicians benefit from heightened brain activity that allows them to process information from their eyes and ears more efficiently than non-musicians. They found that the part of the brain that interprets sound, known as the auditory cortex, responds faster in people with musical training and is better primed to pick out subtle patterns from the huge volumes of information that flood into the brain from our senses… Professor Kraus and her team have used a method known as electroencephalography, which measures electrical activity in the brain, to examine how musicians and non-musicians brains respond to different stimulus. She found that people who are better at picking out harmonies and timing in sounds are also better at reading. Preliminary findings, which are still to be published, have also shown that musicians are better at reading. She is currently conducting a major study of children in schools in Chicago to test whether musical training can improve their reading skills.” Read the whole article here. Thanks to Ava Spece for sharing.

Want Job Creation? Try the Arts

February 15th, 2010

Here is an excerpt from the March 1st, 2009, San Diego Tribune article Want Job Creation? Try the Arts by Dalouge Smith, president and CEO of San Diego Youth Symphony and Conservatory and vice president of California Arts Advocates: “In times of crisis, we expect our leaders to use data instead of ideology to make the difficult choices necessary to restore stability. Unfortunately, this has not been the case regarding the arts in the recent debate surrounding the economic stimulus bill passed by Congress… Lawmakers are appropriately emphasizing job creation but clearly need to be reminded that a thriving cultural sector creates jobs. Because of the distribution of jobs across many organizations — for example, San Diego Opera issued 616 employee tax documents for 2008 while Sushi Visual and Performing Arts issued 20 — the arts and culture sector is not likely to make a dramatic announcement of job cuts in a single day. Instead, job losses will come a little at a time. Some will be reported, as the Union-Tribune has done with recent job losses at museums. More likely, they will be the unannounced result of program changes or contracted education efforts with the concomitant reduction in staffing.” You can read the whole article here.

Editorial: The Arts Create Real Jobs

February 1st, 2010

Peggy Amsterdam’s editorial published in the Philadelphia Enquirer December 23rd, 2009, excerpted below, explains why it makes sense to include arts funding in federal and local stimulus/jobs programs. “Sens. John McCain and Tom Coburn recently criticized how some of the federal stimulus money has been spent. They took specific aim at several National Endowment for the Arts grants for arts employment across the country, highlighting two Philadelphia-based groups, Pig Iron Theatre Co. and Spiral Q Puppet Theater. The $25,000 grant for Spiral Q supported a portion of the salary of the organization’s production manager. The $25,000 grant for Pig Iron allowed it to retain the position of associate artistic director and to fund actors’ salaries for its world-premiere production of Welcome to Yuba City. Were the grants worth it? Well, Welcome to Yuba City played to sold-out crowds and received uniformly outstanding reviews. The Northern Liberties neighborhood, where the show took place, was bustling with activity, including collateral spending at restaurants by the thousands of people who attended. Meanwhile, Spiral Q’s grant supported a position responsible for teacher training, internships, neighborhood parades, and other educational programs. Tracy Broyles, Spiral Q’s executive director, said that without the grant, the theater would have had to lay off its production manager and reduce arts-education programming by 50 percent – at a time when there is increasing demand for educational resources from teachers, principals, and community groups serving children in low-income neighborhoods.” To see the whole piece, click here.

Earmarks Need Easier Access: Post Star Editorial

January 29th, 2010

The Post Star Editorial board has come out in favor of earmark reform in a piece published January 29th, 2010. See the whole article here, and an excerpt here: “Earmarks are those special pet projects that congressmen and senators add to bills. Often, they’re for local projects in the congressman’s district. But they’ve also been used to award big contributors for their donations and for powerful interests to buy influence in Congress. In the 2009 federal budget, there were 11,234 earmarks, which added $14.8 billion of often wasteful spending to the federal budget. That’s a tiny percentage in actual dollars of the total federal budget. But it’s not inconsequential in terms of its impact on the behavior of our federal representatives. Knowing the nature and amount of these earmarks is important for citizens to know who might be influencing their representatives in Congress. A single, searchable database to track earmarks would not only allow citizens to view individual requests, but to observe trends and common sources of influence. While the president’s message was meant for Congress, it should also heard on the state level. Member items are often hidden throughout the state budget or kept secret in a similar manner. Yet many state lawmakers, including our own, fail to post their member item requests online. If Sen. Gillibrand and Rep. Murphy can post their earmark requests online, then state Sens. Betty Little and Roy McDonald and Assembly members Teresa Sayward and Tony Jordan can post their member item requests. It’s vitally important that the citizens know who is influencing our representatives and how those representatives are spending our tax money. Making it easier for citizens to access information will go a long way toward that end.”

Obama may add 1.35 billion for Education Initiatives

January 23rd, 2010

National education initiative may place more money in the District for new initiatives. Whole piece here, excerpt here: “As states rushed to meet the January 19 initial deadline to apply for their share of $4.35 billion in federal education money — known as Race to the Top funds — President Obama is seeking to expand the program by $1.35 billion. The initiative, which entices states to enact far-reaching education reforms to qualify for part of the federal money, began as part of the 787 billion stimulus plan. But the proposed expansion ‘marks an early example of the administration moving to transform a one-time stimulus program into a more permanent part of an agency budget,’ The Wall Street Journal reported. The new funds, which will be included in an otherwise ‘barebones’ federal budget proposal, would come in the form of competitive grants given directly to winning school districts. That would differ from the first two rounds of Race to the Top, in which money will be given directly to state governments.”

Global Financial Crisis Threatening Education for All

January 20th, 2010

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization has release a new report on the effect of the recent financial crisis on global education. From the announcement: “Education systems in many of the world’s poorest countries are now experiencing the aftershock of the global economic downturn. The 2010 Education for All Global Monitoring Report, released on 19 January, argues that the crisis could create a lost generation of children whose life chances will have been irreparably damaged by a failure to protect their right to education. The Report examines who these children are and why they are being left behind, and shows that the cost of providing Education for All is much higher than previously estimated. The report looks at concrete solutions for making sure that no children are excluded from schooling.” To download the full press release, a summary, or the full report click here. The issues and ideas presented are relevant for education reform issues within first-world nations/the District.

Miller-McCune Reports on value of Arts Education

January 11th, 2010

In his article for Miller-McCune on January 7th, 2010 titled, Arts Education Promotes Emotional Intelligence, Tom Jacobs reported on recently released scholarly papers from Arts Education Policy Review. Excerpts: “As arts education is pushed further to the margins by the emphasis on standardized testing, a tool for nurturing children’s social and emotional development is being lost. Arts education, which tends to be something of an afterthought in many American school districts, is facing an even tougher time than usual. Twin threats — budget cuts necessitated by dwindling tax revenues and the push to focus on math and reading skills as measured on standardized tests — have left music and art classes in a particularly vulnerable state. In December, for example, the Los Angeles Unified School District proposed eliminating its 350 elementary school arts specialists over the next two years.” Tina Beveridge notes, “If we marginalize all non-tested subjects, we create a system in which only the affluent members of our society have access to the most comprehensive and well-rounded educations, which widens the achievement gap rather than closes it.” See the entire article here.

Kennedy Center President Calls for Lower Ticket Prices

January 8th, 2010

In his latest column for The Huffington Post, John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts President Michael Kaiser made a number of interesting assertions. A few excerpts: “The central challenge facing arts managers is to fill the ever-widening gap between rapidly increasing expenses and earned income, primarily from ticket sales. This gap continues to grow each year since the number of seats we have to sell does not increase but expenses do. We need to find productive ways to lower our costs. Cutting programming is not a good solution, but establishing creative joint ventures and reducing infrastructure are. And we need to work actively and aggressively to increase fund raising revenue (by producing exciting work and marketing that work well) and use a portion of this revenue to lower ticket prices. We do not need to lower the prices of all tickets, however. We find that the buyers of the higher price tickets are less price sensitive; they will buy at any cost. That is why the premium price tickets on Broadway continue to sell.” To see the whole article, click here.

.”